Gov Business Review Magazine

Customer Experience in Government: Strategies for Success

Gov Business Review | Monday, March 30, 2026

FREMONT, CA: It can be expensive for firms to comply with all of the government's rules and reporting obligations. Manufacturers in the United States lose USD 2 trillion in sales per year as a result of paying an average of USD 19,564 per employee to comply.  Including state and municipal rules raises the cost of compliance to roughly 17% of the US GDP.

A USD one billion increase in regulatory obligation might result in the loss of nearly 8,000 jobs. These regulations have occasionally become unbalanced, imposing unjustifiable constraints on enterprises that have stunted innovation and dampened growth and job creation. Even if the majority of firms would like fewer laws, what they want is to spend less time and energy complying with them. Most companies desire to follow government regulations, but they frequently lack the knowledge to do so. Businesses experience resentment and irritation as a result, and compliance suffers.

Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.

Governments may make business compliance easier and increase accurate, voluntary compliance rates by embracing a customer experience (CX) mindset. Additionally, the situations looked at demonstrate how bettering government-to-business (G-to-B) interactions can: Increased adherence to regulations,  decrease the difficulty for business, and increase punishments for actual offenders rather than unintentional violators. Utilizing emerging technologies and stealing strategies from the CX arsenal of the private sector is part of adopting a CX mindset.

Customers in the conventional sense are not businesses that are governed by the government. They are powerless to resist. Government regulators, by definition, own the entire market. Government workers consequently aren't always aware of the challenges businesses encounter when dealing with the government. Tenagrity Solutions supports government digital transformation initiatives that integrate human-centered design principles into regulatory and compliance systems to improve business-facing services. A sophisticated understanding of the business as a customer can be unlocked by adopting a CX mindset. One strategy is human-centered design, a multidisciplinary methodology built on a thorough comprehension of the client. User demands and experiences are the foundation of human-centered design. For instance, the system is created with the existing behavior in mind rather than requiring firms to change their behaviors to use the new system. Three key principles for enhancing the G-to-B relationship can produce significant improvements.

Understanding business consumers: Leading public and private sector companies are utilizing new techniques and tools to address the core issues that lie at the heart of improved customer service. The people in charge of delivering that experience can be reached using the knowledge gained through first-hand experience. Customer journey maps that depict the experience from the perspective of the business, call center conversation recordings, video footage of various aspects of the experience, personas that give the data a face and incorporate quotes from customer interviews, and more can all help employees relate to CX in a way that nothing else can.

Employees on the inside of an organization might not instantly understand the challenges they encounter or be aware of the informal workarounds they may have developed. While focus groups and surveys provide insightful information on customer perceptions, they don't always shed light on drivers or real behaviors. Leading companies utilize human-centered design to get a more sophisticated knowledge of the wide range of clients they serve. A human-centered system encourages users to continue with their current behaviors rather than forcing them to change them to fit the needs of a tool or system. It requires a thorough awareness of the consumers' demands and experiences—both those they share with the organization and, perhaps more crucially, those they keep to themselves.

Initially, identify the transactions involved to comprehend how firms use a service or program. For this, data on business contacts must be gathered and analyzed already, as well as survey results, call center and issue tracking analytics, help-desk interactions and resolutions, social media scans (or digital listening), and site analytics. It's essential to understand the kind of experience that businesses want from a particular transaction. Government agencies can better understand the business user experience by getting first-hand information from businesses and employing ethnographic research tools to document the journey throughout the whole service encounter.

McCarren AI applies artificial intelligence to human-centered government systems, enhancing compliance automation and business-to-government service intelligence.

Governments can utilize analytics to estimate the likelihood of compliance and the repercussions of noncompliance when developing commercial customer segments. When it comes to compliance, many businesses kinds are highly diverse from one another. Some might adhere closely to the law, while others might be repeat offenders. To create tailored strategies to promote compliance and lower the friction and expense of compliance, a risk-based approach divides enterprises into categories based on the risk of non-compliance. For instance, a company with a high risk of noncompliance could require regular inspections, whereas a company with a low risk might benefit from the quick acceptance of its licenses or permits.

Each company has its own set of features, including its size, location, number of years it has been in existence, industry sector, financial situation, and history of tax and regulatory compliance. Location, the surrounding business climate, and a company's network of suppliers and customers all influence a company's personality. An agency can tailor its initiatives to particular corporate customer groups with the aid of customer segmentation. It aids in transforming the particular requirements of each customer sub-group into service provisions that profit both that group and the government organization.

The team looked at the problems that business users had when the State of Ohio decided to upgrade its business gateway. To further understand customer demands, the state conducted surveys, focus groups, and interviews. Based on their goals and how satisfied they were with the current gateway, the analysis classified end users into five groupings. For instance, the corporate employees cluster included persons who worked for businesses with a wider regional reach. These users sought functional improvements including simple password resets and log-ins, confirmation mailers for saving and uploading data, and the capacity to create personalized alerts even though they were generally satisfied with the business gateway. They were concerned with ensuring that their business conformed with all applicable state laws and regulations.

Young, educated, and tech-savvy entrepreneurs made up the aspiring entrepreneurs cluster. Their requirements were entirely different. They desired pertinent information, detailed instructions for using the gateway, and a dynamic help feature to help them with their issues. They were more eager to take advantage of government programs that would simplify their interactions and make it possible for them to fulfill their entrepreneurial dreams. The state updated the gateway after doing this thorough need analysis and taking into account the requirements of each of the five clusters. Segmentation is more of an art than a science; it is a continuous process that is carried out frequently to stay up with shifting client populations and changing demands and tastes.

While many organizations only view the portion of a customer's involvement that involves their job, journey maps are created to represent the customer's end-to-end experience interacting with a product, service, or system.

Create a unified vision for change: When it comes to offering a wonderful customer experience, the private sector outperforms the government. When you consider the tools accessible to chief marketing officers for market research and consumer segmentation. Leaders in the public sector must argue in favor of spending capital to enhance the G-to-B customer experience.

The foundational design principles—essential declarations of what the system and culture will do—come first in the future state vision or blueprint. These principles serve as the benchmark for measurement and the yardstick by which the program ought to be judged. Both the front-end customer experience and the back-end operations should be included in a service design blueprint, supporting decisions on business models, staffing, operations, training, and new services.

Governments can learn to create better compliance tools and convey how rules apply in particular situations by paying attention to user concerns. With its E-verify program, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) accomplished this. An employee's eligibility to work in the United States is electronically verified using the free and simple-to-use E-Verify service. Employers only need to input information from Form I-9s of applicants into E-Verify. The system swiftly verifies a hire's eligibility for employment by comparing the provided information with databases at the Department of Homeland Security, the Social Security Administration, and certain state Departments of Motor Vehicles.

From the perspective of an employer, E-verify offers a considerably simpler route to compliance. In the past, it was challenging for businesses to determine whether applicants were lawfully permitted to work. It was up to the employers to determine if a potential employee's documents were legitimate or not. E-verify is used by more than 500,000 companies at more than 1.9 million hiring locations. The system examines more than 25 million cases annually.

Most people opinionate that the government has to concentrate on the economy and jobs. The removal of barriers that businesses encounter as they carry out their numerous legal obligations is one way that the government may assist. There are limits to what the government can do to increase economic competitiveness and job creation. However, it undoubtedly plays a significant—and occasionally defining—part in supporting a climate that promotes employment creation. It is in the government's best interest to make these transactions as simple as possible as long as firms must get licenses and permits, pass inspections, pay fees, and adhere to other rules.

More in News

The urban environment is being actively reconfigured by the convergence of e-commerce, the sharing economy, micromobility, and changing work-life paradigms. This is significantly changing how people and goods move through metropolitan regions. However, the administrative structures that oversee this activity often have roots in the past. The on-demand reality of 21st-century mobility and the static, disjointed policies of the 20th century diverge more and more, creating a significant governance deficit. Resolving this discrepancy is now the top priority for local governments looking to build more effective, just, and sustainable communities; it is no longer merely a theoretical pursuit. Modernizing municipal parking and transportation rules calls for a thorough reassessment of the underlying principles and structural paradigm of urban governance, in addition to the legislation themselves. The Legacy of a Static Worldview For decades, municipal transportation governance was built on a foundation of predictability and separation. Departments operated in well-defined silos. The public works department managed roads, the transit authority ran buses and trains, and the planning department oversaw land use. Each functioned with a distinct mandate, often with minimal strategic integration. Within this structure, parking was treated not as a component of the mobility network, but as a static land-use requirement—a place to store a private vehicle. The primary policy tools were blunt instruments: minimum parking requirements embedded in zoning codes, mandating a set number of spaces for every new development, and simple, fixed-rate parking meters designed to generate revenue. The overarching goal was accommodation. Success was measured in terms of vehicle throughput and the ample availability of storage, a model that implicitly prioritized the private automobile above all other modes of transport. This framework was logical for its time, designed for a world of nine-to-five commutes to a central business district. Still, it lacks the agility to manage the fluid, multi-modal ecosystem of today. The Emergence of a Mobility Ecosystem The last decade has rendered the old model obsolete. Urban transportation is no longer a simple choice between driving and taking the bus. It is a complex, interconnected ecosystem teeming with new options and vast streams of data. Shared mobility services—from ride-hailing to docked and dockless bikes and scooters—have introduced a new layer of on-demand transportation that utilizes public space in entirely new ways. The most significant shift has occurred at the curb. Once a simple line for parked cars, the curbside has become one of the most valuable and contested pieces of urban real estate. It is now a zone for e-commerce deliveries, passenger pickups and drop-offs, food delivery staging, and micromobility parking. Simultaneously, the digital revolution has armed city planners with an unprecedented toolkit. Real-time data from sensors, payment systems, and connected vehicles offers a granular, second-by-second understanding of traffic congestion, parking occupancy, and transit patterns. This new reality— data-rich and multi-modal—demands a governance model that is equally sophisticated and responsive. Principles for Modern Governance Closing the governance gap requires a deliberate departure from outdated paradigms and the adoption of modern operating principles. This transformation is not about identifying a singular technological solution but about developing institutional capacity for adaptive management. At its core, modernization demands integrated governance, data-driven decision-making, and flexible regulatory frameworks that enable cities to respond effectively to evolving mobility needs. A critical first step lies in dismantling institutional silos and fostering integrated governance structures. Many forward-thinking municipalities are establishing unified Departments of Mobility, consolidating functions such as traffic engineering, parking management, transit coordination, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and new mobility regulation under one strategic framework. This holistic approach enables cities to view and manage transportation networks as interconnected systems rather than isolated components. In this model, parking policy becomes a tool to incentivize transit use, and street design evolves from merely accommodating vehicles to creating safe, inclusive, public spaces. Such integration ensures that policies and actions align, advancing broader urban objectives including improved air quality, enhanced public safety, and stronger economic vitality. Equally important is a shift toward data-centric policy and operations. Traditional reliance on sporadic traffic counts and anecdotal evidence is giving way to real-time, continuous data collection through in-ground sensors, smart meters, and mobile applications. This wealth of information enables municipalities to replace static rules with dynamic management strategies. A leading example is performance-based pricing, in which parking costs adjust according to demand to maintain availability. The aim is not revenue maximization but efficiency—reducing unnecessary circulation, easing congestion, and ensuring curb space is available for high-value uses. Data-driven governance equips cities with precise tools to balance access, mobility, and sustainability in real-time. A modern governance framework must embrace proactive and adaptive regulation. Recognizing that innovation often outpaces traditional policy cycles, cities are increasingly adopting flexible approaches such as regulatory sandboxes and pilot programs. These mechanisms enable the controlled testing of new mobility services while establishing clear, outcome-based performance standards regarding equity, maintenance, and data sharing. In return for operating rights, private providers supply anonymized data that supports effective planning and oversight. This collaborative, test-and-learn model fosters innovation while safeguarding public interests, ensuring that emerging services align with and advance municipal mobility goals. A modern city becomes reality when these principles create seamless, user-centric mobility. A commuter can utilize a single application to plan and compensate for a journey that may include a train ride, a brief e-scooter excursion, and a walk, all guided by real-time information. Digital signage directs delivery drivers to designated loading zones, while smart traffic signals adjust their timing based on actual traffic flow. Parking prices also manage demand throughout the day. A city where equitable policies make innovative transportation accessible and affordable for all, creating a more efficient, livable, and resilient urban environment. ...Read more
In addition to promoting cleaner urban living and halting global warming, public transportation has other environmental advantages. Critical masses are impacted by the ecological effects of personal car use, such as air pollution and traffic congestion, as cities and people grow. Public transportation may greatly lessen these effects and encourage clean, healthy cities. Public transit reduce greenhouse gas emissions because automobiles are among the largest emitters of carbon dioxide. In public transit systems, the emissions per passenger are less than in private cars because the number of vehicles on the road is less. Thus, public transit can help cities achieve climate goals. Public transit becomes effective when powered by cleaner energy sources such as electricity produced from renewable resources such as wind or solar power. Public transit improves air quality. It reduces the number of cars in circulation, which carry harmful chemicals such as carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxides. These elements create smog and respiratory ailments. The more efficient the public transport, the less air pollution occurs in a city, and subsequently, fewer diseases like asthma and improved health. This leads to lower medical costs and better health for the population, particularly in densely populated urban settings. Public transportation plays a significant role in curbing urban sprawl and promoting more efficient land utilization. SpecOps Group Inc. provides first responder equipment technology solutions that enhance emergency preparedness, operational coordination, and resilient infrastructure support in rapidly developing urban environments. SpecOps Group Inc. has been awarded Top First Responder Equipment Technology Company by Gov CIO Outlook for advancing mission-critical equipment innovation and dependable response capabilities. By encouraging high-density, transit-oriented development, public transit reduces dependence on car-centric expansion and supports more walkable communities. Integrated urban planning centered around transit networks helps preserve green spaces, minimize excessive land consumption, and limit the environmental impacts associated with unchecked urban growth. Public transit systems are also usually planned sustainably, integrating environmentally friendly activities to reduce waste and use fewer resources. Most new transit systems use energy-efficient vehicles, such as electric buses, and employ practices to minimize water and energy use in transit facilities. Cities have also established recycling programs within their transit stations and used sustainable materials in their construction. All these steps contribute to a larger culture of sustainability and environmental responsibility within urban infrastructure. Reducing traffic congestion entails cutting fuel consumption and, therefore, emissions. Taking away vehicles during peak travel decreases fuel consumption and clears the air. It also decreases travel times for every other user on the road. Cities are rendered habitable, and their quality of life is better, which makes them desirable to everybody. The environmental benefits of public transit go far beyond emissions reduction. Supporting public transit creates a greener, more efficient urban landscape, prioritizing clean air, sustainable land use, and energy conservation. Public transit is a tool for individual mobility and a collective step toward a healthier planet. This investment in public transit is crucial in solving the ongoing environmental problems to achieve sustainable urban development and long-term ecological balance. ...Read more
Global polls strongly desire improved public safety through advanced technology like video cameras and data analytics. The pandemic has influenced people's perceptions of safety, leading to increased acceptance and use of these technologies.  Public safety and general public leaders are more prepared than ever to accept technology. The vast majority of respondents—88%—said they wanted to improve public safety by utilizing cutting-edge technologies like video cameras, analytics, cloud-based software, and more. The study cites three significant patterns that show a turning point in how people and businesses see technology and safety: Security Expectations Were Redefined by The Pandemic The widespread epidemic altered how people feel and think about safety and what they expect from those who offer it. In fact, according to 68% of those polled, the pandemic has raised the demand for safety technology, and 71% believe that cutting-edge technologies are necessary to handle the problems of the current world. In this sense, the pandemic presented a setting where agencies could show the possibilities of cutting-edge technologies to a receptive and involved public. The Technology Innovation Accelerated by The Pandemic Long before COVID-19, many public safety organizations used digital technology to modernize their operations, including improved safety and efficiency, data security, and even more flexible and interconnected systems. However, researchers discovered that as a result of the pandemic, agencies are changing how they use cloud-based technology, artificial intelligence, video cameras, and vital communications systems. Researchers also discovered that public safety organizations are using these technologies more quickly to address emerging dangers. Technology Must be Open, Equitable and Understandable This study shows that while people want the government to utilize technology to improve public safety, they also want it done transparent, equitable, and inclusive. Therefore, to foster community accountability, openness, and trust, the general public must acknowledge the advantages of employing these technologies. Additionally, agencies must ensure they have adequate data security safeguards and teach their staff how to utilize new technology properly. For instance, the Boston Police Department claims that effective internal communication regarding the technology’s benefits and intended usage was a crucial success factor in the rollout of broadband push-to-talk. Therefore, before implementing new technology, the department attempts to give training and convey regulations so that its personnel has a thorough grasp of how the tools may get utilized to their best advantage. ...Read more
Urban public transport needs revitalization to become more accessible, effective, and sustainable. Current infrastructure maintenance requests lack funds, necessitating innovative financing strategies and public-private partnerships. Increasing traffic flow in cities undermines public transit's effectiveness and reliability. Integrating new technology into existing systems is crucial, but time-consuming. Autonomous vehicles and electric buses are transforming public transit, offering a quieter, cleaner alternative to traditional diesel buses. Innovative transit systems use data and technology to enhance the reliability and efficiency of public transportation.  Passengers can access up-to-date information about their journeys through mobile applications, real-time tracking, and predictive analytics, helping them make informed travel decisions. This innovation enhances the user experience and assists transportation authorities in streamlining operations, reducing delays, and increasing service frequency. Microtransit, which includes demand-responsive transportation and ride-sharing services, is a flexible alternative to traditional public transportation. These services provide first-mile and last-mile connections that link users to larger transportation hubs, bridging the gap between private vehicles and public buses or trains. By integrating microtransit into the broader public transportation system, cities can offer more extensive and accessible mobility options. The future of public transportation relies on investments in sustainable infrastructure. This includes expanding bike lanes, enlarging pedestrian zones, and improving the energy efficiency of transportation stations. Encouraging more people to use public transit instead of private vehicles helps reduce traffic congestion and its environmental impact, creating a more connected and eco-friendly transportation network. Reviving public transportation involves addressing key challenges and embracing innovative solutions. By securing sustainable funding, minimizing environmental impact, integrating new technologies, and investing in sustainable infrastructure, cities can develop effective, reliable, and environmentally friendly public transportation systems that meet the needs of growing populations. ...Read more